Comments on: Blogger.com not too good for web 2.0 marketing

By: Hillary Whitfield

Hillary Whitfield — Sun, 26 Dec 2010 00:40:41 +0000

Matt, I don’t think that WordPress is any better. Did you try to use your link generator for this blog? I am now sure I am in favor of using meta descriptions since Google tends to ignore it 99.9999% of the time. However they might be useful when other engines are concerned. Good tool, I will definitely use it.

By: Dan Nicolas

Dan Nicolas — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:50:02 +0000

Hi found your content to be very interesting appriciate the good work you doing…

By: Al Patoni

Al Patoni — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:49:26 +0000

I’m pretty sure the coding done for Blogger.com is still the same as it was when it was first started up. But, then again, coding websites like that isn’t the easiest thing to do. Maybe they need to fix their stupid source code.

By: Vlad Zablotskyy

Vlad Zablotskyy — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:30:43 +0000

Raxit,

Are most of your blogs are on blogger.com? I found it very difficult to get your blogger.com blogs ranked well.

By: Nikhil Raxit

Nikhil Raxit — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:36:47 +0000

Email me at nikhil.raxit@gmail.com

By: Nikhil Raxit

Nikhil Raxit — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:35:23 +0000

I do not have much idea about how the Meta Tags works in ranking/listing the blog posts on the global search engines. So far I have listed 21 blogs and found two of them listed on the google (its taking time, dont know why). But, received no viewers so far (Except the people I had invited personally. Could you please give more thought about when and how I can see more hits to these postings?

By: Vlad Zablotskyy

Vlad Zablotskyy — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:49:17 +0000

Matt,

I don’t think that WordPress is any better. Did you try to use your link generator for this blog?

I am now sure I am in favor of using meta descriptions since Google tends to ignore it 99.9999% of the time.

However they might be useful when other engines are concerned. Good tool, I will definitely use it.